International Precious Metals (IPMCF) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Josephus who wrote (27989)	11/21/1997 7:21:00 PM
From: Larry Brubaker	Read Replies (1) of 35569

"I'm still confused as to why IPM released these low assay numbers. It's like they "wanted" the price to drop. If they could have controlled the release of negative news about bulk tests, etc (perhaps through some means of plausable deniability or something similiar), why then this release? It's too stupid to be stupid." You are not the only one to think that IPM may have deliberately wanted the price to drop. One theory is that this would allow whoever is supposedly going to purchase IPM's PP to get cheap shares. Then IPM announces good news to get the price back up and the purchaser of those debentures will be in the money. Interesting theory and one I wouldn't completely discount. But I'm not sure I would want to bet on it either.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next