SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : View from the Center and Left

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Bread Upon The Water who wrote (180817)1/31/2012 8:36:03 PM
From: JohnM  Read Replies (2) of 541671
 
Many of the early existentialists, both Sartre and Heidegger principally, read Kierkegaard as an early existentialist. Almost any history of existentialism you read starts at least with Kierkegaard and any respectable anthology will include some of Kierkegaard.

If I understand koan correctly, he's arguing that existentialism was premised on a belief in a secular world, single storied universe, and so on. And he reads Kierkegaard as not doing so, ergo the reference to Darwin.

I think the better watershed is Nietzsche. In philosophy, much is pre and post N. Then the question becomes just how Kierkegaard is read as in the same tradition as Nietzsche. Obviously, if the criteria is belief in some sort of supernatural being and since you can read Kierkegaard as having such a belief, that makes the two incompatible. But a lot of philosophy did not do so, including at least Sartre and Heidegger.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext