SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Illyia's Heart on SI

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
From: illyia2/6/2012 9:53:12 AM
   of 7567
 
Time To Buy CDS On The Boston Fed?
By Tyler Durden
Published on ZeroHedge ( http://www.zerohedge.com)

Created 02/06/2012 - 09:16

[1]
Submitted by Tyler Durden [1] on 02/06/2012 09:16 -0500

CDS [2] Federal Reserve [3] Federal Reserve Bank [4]
    Something interesting happened in last week's H.4.1 release: the Fed disclosed that, for the first time ever, a Fed bank actually suffered a "loss" when the Boston Fed's Interest on Federal Reserve Notes (IOFRN) liability went negative, and quite negative at that.

    [5]

    As a reminder, the IOFRN liability is the accrual of Federal Reserve income to be repatriated to the Treasury the following week, or money made by the Fed system stand alone "hedge funds."

    So does this whopping miss indicate an actual loss by a Fed - something that every economist says is inconceivable (after all they can just print it away). Maybe. Maybe not. Here is Stone McCarthy [6]with an alterantive explanation, which shows that the only thing more screwed up with the modern financial system, is the accounting practices that govern it.

    This accounting abnormality stemmed from an increase in the volume of Paid in Capital from member banks to the Boston Fed. By statute member banks have to set aside 6% of their capital to be members of the Federal Reserve System. The requirement is that only 3% or half of the 6% actually has to be invested in the Fed, the other 3% is sort of on call.

    During the week ended February 1, 2012 an additional $379 mln of capital was paid in by member banks of the Boston District.

    Also by statute the Federal Reserve Bank most maintained a Surplus equalled to the paid in capital of member banks. Thus the Boston Fed had to inject a matching $379 mln in capital. This increased the overall Paid in Capital of the Boston Fed to $1.322 mln.

    The matching injection of capital by the Boston Fed came at the expense of the IOFRN accrual. In other words, the Boston Fed did not suffer a loss in the traditional sense, but had to retain $379 mln in earnings that they didn't have immediately on hand.

    Without this $379 mln capital injection, the IOFRN accrual would have been comfortably positive. Welcome to the world of Fed accounting.

    Welcome indeed, to a world where Fed hedge funds always make "profits" (until they don't), where accounting practices pull money out of Fed's communicating liability vessels (until all of them are empty), and where even a loss is somehow a profit.

    Similar Articles You Might Enjoy:

    CDS Federal Reserve Federal Reserve Bank

      Source URL: http://www.zerohedge.com/news/time-buy-cds-boston-fed
      Links:
      [1] zerohedge.com
      [2] zerohedge.com
      [3] zerohedge.com
      [4] zerohedge.com
      [5] zerohedge.com
      [6] smra.com
      [7] twitter.com
      Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
       Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext