Marcus, thanks for your post
Proabably the only thing we have a chance of confirming, is item #7 - If it really was tossed, and if so, why.
Now the question is: how do we confirm this? If the lawyers who were representing the plaintiff could be contacted, would they be willing to comment on the case?
In regards to the items you posted, items #1 through #6, I offer my comments to "E.F."
1. "Only good things are being heard about the company."
Anyone heard any good news lately (from someone other than a broker?), announcements, anything?
2. "Friends are telling their friends that this is a good time to buy and people are getting referrals again".
Yup, I think the volume was @ 50K today. At .0025, that equates to ...$125 in trades today! Sizzling. See'n alot of volume these days, how about you? ;)
3. "Tom Hanscombe and John Hittingliter (??) are still with the company and are doing a good job."
Remarkably, I believe Mr. Hanscombe and Hinterleitner are still with the company. Technically, that is. Always away, in meetings. Never return calls. If they spoke to the shareholder, they might get more credibility. Never hear from them, always hear about them.
If the measurement tool is stock prices, I'm sorry.
4. "Comparator is talking to 3 foreign governments."
And Son of Sam actually talked to a dog, who told him to kill.
Lets assume just for grins, they -really- have cleared the suit out of their way. Also assume they have worked their debt down to a negligible amount. They would then have a fairly clean shell for sale. We, as shareholders are the company's only viable things Comparator has to market, foreign or domestic.
Also, "talk" is just talk. And it's cheap too.
5. "Everything is going to be moved to card form."
Ambiguous statement. What is "everything"? Is "everything" anything?
6. "Comparator has paid all monies for the rights to the technology to the inventor of it."
This is coming from a company that only a few months ago was living off funds from picked up from spare change panhandling. Also, this seems inconsistent with the most recent 10KSB (10/14/97) which outlines a need of $1/2 million for sales and marketing plan. No mention is made of Manufacture, which leads me to ask the question: Why even acquire the rights, if you aren't going to address (or even mention) a build plan to your shareholders?
Also, a general question: if you acquire technology, do you acquire any patents associated with the technology? If so, I'll be watching the Government patent databases to see if anything shows up for Comparator. So far, all they have is one useless patent filed in 1994, for the company logo.
I offer this to the Officers and directors of Comparator:
1) The investment community is once burned, twice shy. Don't piss us off any more, you'll lose the only asset this company has.
2) Show me the money!
3) Actions speak louder than words
4) Show me the money!
5) Communicate detail and truths to the shareholders
6) Oh and if I didn't mention it, Show me the money!
I have to laugh to (or at) myself, as to why I track this thing.
Morbid curiosity, I guess.
Someone check the bottle with the stiff...he need another, or is he pretty much pickled?
I conclude my bitch session :)
Lar |
