International Precious Metals (IPMCF) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Chuca Marsh who wrote (28015)	11/22/1997 12:46:00 AM
From: Brander	Read Replies (1) of 35569

Chuca, if IPM had strong evidence of higher recovery numbers and did not report them, they would be guilty of withholding information that that was significant towards the value of this company. The board of directors could be sued. It is in my interest to see the value of the stock go up, but I think the best way to see this happen is to realize that the best numbers we have now are the ones that have been reported, and then to go from there. This is the reality of the present situation. The shorts did not create it; it is what Bateman found. Speaking of withholding significant information, I strongly feel that the shareholders have a right to see what BD found. After all the BD talk from IPM, I can't believe that they have left that out. Brad

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next