Maxam Gold Corp. OBB:MXAM Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Maxam Gold Corp. OBB:MXAM

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Richard Mazzarella who wrote (3097)	11/22/1997 9:15:00 AM
From: Tim Hall	Read Replies (2) of 11603

Sure I think zero pollution has merit. All mining companies strive for zero pollution. If it can be accomplished so cheaply by just adding a few more columns, why aren't all of the Nevada operations utilizing it. They already have all of the nasties in solution, just add a few more columns and collect and sell them. Seems like it would be gravy and solve a lot of permitting problems. Maxam is doing all of this so they don't need a water quality permit. Why not just get the permit? It is not that hard. Out in that dry old desert they should be able to prove that all of the nasties will stay in the tailings pond? If they haven't done all of their ore reserves, how do they know where to locate their plant. Since they have their plant already located on 5 acres and are going to mine the five acres, it would seem that the plant is located over part of the ore body. The plant should be located where it won't have to be moved later on. Call Dale and ask him. They are so busy, I don't want to bother them. Follow the money Tim Hall

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next