SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Evolution

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Brumar89 who wrote (21174)2/12/2012 3:47:01 PM
From: mel2211 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) of 69300
 
>> I'm sure people 1000 ya, knew about erosion and they didn't attribute natural arches to divine creation.

I doubt it. Creationists today still teach their children the earth is about 6,000 years old. Doesn't fit in with geological processes that take many millions of years.

Also, by your own standards, these theories that explain natural arches are only theories. As you have suggested in the past, until a theory is proven in a lab, it is not a fact. To the creationist, that which is not attributed to fact, is attributed to God.

You made this very point to me about science's inability to create life from scratch in a lab.

As of today, natural arches have not been created in a lab. The theories suggest these arches take millions of years and specialized geologic conditions to be created. (sounds a lot like the difficulties with origin of life studies at the present time).

A creationist being consistent would not accept these theories.The only conclusion left is that God created the arches as part of creation.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext