Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting

QCOM 177.78

-2.2%

Jan 9 9:30 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Jim Mullens who wrote (109506)	2/13/2012 4:05:41 PM
From: Art Bechhoefer	Read Replies (3) of 197157

Jim and Slacker -- Didn't we learn from discovery in one of the Apple-Samsung disputes that Apple does actually have a license from Qualcomm? I know that the issue here is whether Apple's manufacturer Foxconn, and not Apple itself has the Qualcomm license. But I think that Samsung determined that Apple actually does have a license. That would be in line with Qualcomm policy not to allow sales of devices with QCOM IP to firms not licensed by QCOM. In any event, if Apple does have a QCOM license, doesn't that throw a zinger into Motorola's case, and allow Apple to cement what is becoming a monopoly in smartphones and tablets? Art

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next