SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : PSIX up 26.5%, Takeover(?)
PSIX 73.96-3.6%3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Curtis Gruber who wrote (1558)11/22/1997 12:30:00 PM
From: Sandie  Read Replies (1) of 5650
 
Assets versus Earnings:

BT pored over MCI's earnings erosion, forced a 25% reduction in their bid ($40 to $30) thereby knocking MCI's market price down and creating an opening for WCOM's all-stock deal. BT facilitated the sale as surely as if they had brokered it directly. For a few bil, BT toyed with MCI and lost them.

Telecom networks are scarce and hard to replicate. In an accumulation phase which the telecom industry is clearly undergoing, the watch-phrase is "assets at any cost". Those who gnash their teeth over EPS shortfalls I think are missing the big picture.

Schraeder's latest strategy appears to be "assets over earnings", and I applaud this, though with some trepidation. As we know, Bill has a history of lurching from strategy to strategy: into retail, out of retail, into software, out of software, into account accumulation, now into "quality" account retention. For a while, Schraeder even half-played the Wall Street game, making a string of silly earnings projections which have harmed this stock more than just about anything else.

Forget the earnings; he now has the cash to make PSINet into a saleable asset. Not a business mind you, but a saleable asset. Of course, this is where I get the tremors...I mean, we all agree that you are building a saleable asset and not a business oh Great Founder of the first ISP? Could it be that we, the mercenary shareholders who are always a $19.95 trade away fom divesting ourselves of PSIX, have our eye on a different prize? That is, stock appreciation at any cost?
I mean, we'd own Wal-mart tomorrow if we thought we could make a faster buck. For Bill, maybe stock performance is, say, fourth behind running a visible public company, being asked to speak at industry events, and having a big highback leather chair.

Who out there can say with assurance that Bill is fighting for us and not for, well...Bill?

Come on, even Bill doesn't buy the go-it-alone line. They use that to fill out the press releases because it sounds a lot less plaintive than "please buy me", right?

If we get killed in this stock, it will be bitterly unfair. Mind you, I am optimistic. But if it happens, our cause of death will be Founder's Complex.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext