SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Big Dog's Boom Boom Room

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: raybiese who wrote (163726)2/15/2012 3:11:01 PM
From: Archie Meeties6 Recommendations  Read Replies (4) of 206338
 
"gasoline consumption reflects recession and growth."

So what should we do with the gdp, trucking, rail, manufacturing, initial unemployment claims data?

There's only one response if you believe we're in a recession; the government is lying (except about the gasoline data).

Confirmation Bias: The Bias to seek information that confirms your belief.
Confirmation bias recipe?

Belief + Emotion + data contrary to belief = Seeking confirmation of challenged belief = confirmation bias. Could also be an example of the backfire effect cognitive bias.

So in this case;

First believe that we're in a recession because it's repugnant to think that current politicians could contribute to an economic expansion. But wait, positive gdp after gdp , manufacturing expanding, so that can't be right. Aha! Gasoline proves that we are in fact in a recession!

Same thing with the employment #'s. If you believe employment has to be bad because of lousy, disgusting policy, then no set of data will convince one that unemployment is getting better. The only possible explanation is that the government is conspiring, lying, the data is wrong, etc.

Falling gasoline data will have some mundane explanation, and it will not be "austerity".
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext