SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Mainstream Politics and Economics
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Steve Lokness who wrote (9471)2/16/2012 4:17:08 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (1) of 85487
 
Its objectively irrelevant Steve.

"Not including contraceptive coverage in insurance contracts" doesn't even vaguely resemble "not allowing access to contraception", or 'not uisng contraception".

Including such coverage doesn't equal or resemble "contraceptives will be used". It doesn't cause extra or more reliable contraception usage, at least not to any significant extent.

If I was arguing for outlawing contraception (which I have not, am not, and will not do) then your point about contraception would be relevant. But this discussion isn't about contraception, its about including it in insurance coverage.

The employees in question can easily afford contraception (at least if they have enough forethought and discipline to effectively use it in the first place), and including it in coverage doesn't really save them money anyway.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News