Mainstream Politics and Economics Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Mainstream Politics and Economics

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: longnshort who wrote (9443)	2/16/2012 6:28:34 PM
From: Bread Upon The Water	Read Replies (1) of 85487

I'm not sure "uproar" is the right word, but generally opposed to this requirement yes. The ultra sound of the fetus, to my understanding, takes place outside the vagina (think it's on top of the stomach) an already a pro forma medical requirement but not a legal requirement in the case of all abortions. Several states have either recently added or proposed the requirement that the woman be exposed to a viewing of the fetus before undergoing an abortion. The law requiring this in Texas is currently being challenged in federal court. This vaginal probe thing, to my knowledge, is an additional requirement being proposed and I think, but am not sure, in association with the morning after pill. IF it pass a state legislature it will undoubtedly be litigated as well.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next