SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF)

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Bob Markley who wrote (28103)11/22/1997 3:24:00 PM
From: GlobalMarine  Read Replies (2) of 35569
 
IPM Top Ten puzzlements, in my opinion:

1) 1997 RSA Interview with Dr. Sam Shaw: "Yes, after I investigated and became familiar with IPM in the first couple months of 1997 and with my knowledge of the work I did with BD in 1994 and 1995, I bought my first shares in March."

The stock price ranged in price from about $7 to $14 during March, 1997. The stock now trades around $2.

2) 1997 RSA Interview with Dr. Sam Shaw: "I knew just two tasks were needed, an economical extraction method and an assay method needed to evaluate the resource, we are there now with these two tasks."

From the Q and A at the IPM website: "...the recovery method is considered by Bateman to be non-commercial..."

November 14, 1997 message to Frank from Lee Furlong, distributed by RSA: "Unfortunately during the following 2 months we and other independent labs were unable to duplicate the assay methodology, thus it failed to live up to the 'due diligence' by IPM. The procedure was therefore abandoned and the purchase agreement with AuRIC cancelled."

3) From the June 24, 1997 press release: "The assay of the same samples was done at least two times to confirm consistency and repeatability of results...The development of a standard fire assay from head grade samples represents a major breakthrough in IPM's efforts at proving the existence, and recoverability, of mineralization from Black Rock material."

November 14, 1997 message to Frank from Lee Furlong, distributed by RSA: "Unfortunately during the following 2 months we and other independent labs were unable to duplicate the assay methodology, thus it failed to live up to the 'due diligence' by IPM. The procedure was therefore abandoned and the purchase agreement with AuRIC cancelled."

4) From the November 14, 1997 press release: "The program to develop the mining and recovery of precious metals from Black Rock ore will be a multi-phased multi-tasked effort. It will be directed by IPM and supported by Bateman Engineering utilizing their resources, contract test work facilities and specialty process engineers. As part of this program Bateman will also be providing the expertise to assist in the development of a cost-effective process to extract metals. The company estimates that the Development Program will take between twelve to eighteen months. Its objectives are to determine the grade, scale and economics of the project and produce a full feasibility document with a view to taking Black Rock into production."

From the November 14, 1997 message to Frank from Lee Furlong: "With the information in hand, management will proceed to now test the more than 30 recovery methods immediately available to determine
which one might be best."

From the Q & A on the website: "The association with Bateman Engineering should assure shareholders of a thorough evaluation of all available technologies from North America and abroad to help determine the most efficient and economic methodology that can be applied to Black Rock."

Hmmm, it took almost a year to evaluate the last recovery process to determine that it wasn't an efficient and economic methodology. Does this mean that the company esimates it will only take 12 to 18 months to evaluate the other 30+ recovery methods immediately available to determine which one might be best?

Anyone care to finish the list? I'm too tired to go on.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext