CSGI ...READY FOR TAKE-OFF! Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : CSGI ...READY FOR TAKE-OFF!

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: tech who wrote (1373)	11/22/1997 4:05:00 PM
From: TEDennis	Read Replies (1) of 3391

tech: The code for the MD Nevada project was originally converted using the "packed binary" technique. However, after MD announced support for the more "socially acceptable" techniques, Nevada requested that it be redone. I don't know whether they used windowing, full expansion, or a combination of the two. I don't know what the current status is, whether or not it went through testing by Nevada yet (of course, if you believe in their testing claims, then site testing is unnecessary ... the code will work the same as it did before conversion). A lot has happened since the Nevada conversion. The proper place to get up to date info on that one is on the ZITL thread. You are correct ... just because I haven't heard of CSGI's (or MD's, or any of the multitude of 'solutions') successes doesn't mean that they haven't had any. It just means I haven't heard about them. The Millennium project (look out ... this is heresy!) is no big deal, in my opinion. It was an HP3000 conversion. When they start cranking out MVS conversions, then I'll sit up and take notice ... and tell those folks who contact me for suggestions. Until I'm sure that they can deliver in that environment, I'm not advocating them. TED

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next