SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : A US National Health Care System?

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Lane3 who wrote (23176)2/19/2012 6:24:21 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (1) of 42652
 
It teaches you that you don't know something until you can demonstrate it.

Depending on exactly what you mean by know, not really. The validity of the most basic ideas behind science can not itself be demonstrated. I buy in to those ideas rather strongly, but if you can't know anything that isn't demonstrated, then you can't know anything (including what has been demonstrated scientifically). For the strongest tightest possible meaning of know, then yes, I can't know that slavery is wrong, but I can't know that any observation is correct either (or that any mind other than my own exists, or that anything I perceive is real). If you mean "know" to mean "to be certain that" then your right I can't know what I've claimed, but I haven't been defending the idea that I know it in that way (or even to a lower standard that would normally be called certain, but isn't really absolute certainty). I specifically said that my ideas in this area may be wrong, I think more than once. I just said they are ideas about reality. If reality does not match them, then they are false ideas about reality, which I've acknowledged as a possibility.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext