SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : A US National Health Care System?
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: TimF who wrote (23189)2/20/2012 11:58:48 AM
From: Lane3  Read Replies (1) of 42652
 
And "imposing rules" would be even further from the truth than "an injustice".

I wasn't arguing that it was an injustice.

You haven't explained why "'imposing rules' would be even further from the truth."

Your employer in this case would be imposing it's rules/values on you. If your employer has some moral or ethical problem with driving Ferraris such as gas guzzling, great risk of injury, frivolous excess, misuse of resources better spent on the starving children of the world, character harm (spoiling), etc., then that's being imposed on you by the employer's refusal to participate on behalf of its employees. If it doesn't apply to the rest of the employed population and it does apply to you, your employer is knowingly and intentionally denying this to its employees as a result of the employer's values, then the employer's values/rules are being imposed on you.

I don't see how it could be otherwise.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News