To avoid a possibly purely semantic argument going on longer, lets drop "impose" for now.
In you opinion is an employer refusing to buy a Ferrari, or a stick of gum, for me, controlling me, infringing my liberty, abusing me, agressing against me, and/or an injustice? -
If its an issue of moral values, if it isn't, if everybody else in the company (or maybe every group other than the one the person making the decision manages) gets one, if others don't, if its a direct payment from the employer, if there is some sort of extra part involved like an insurance company, and for any combination of those things that you think is significant (if for example a particular answer requires that it be about moral values, then there wouldn't be any point going through all the combinations that aren't about moral values) |
