In you opinion is an employer refusing to buy a Ferrari, or a stick of gum, for me, controlling me, infringing my liberty, abusing me, agressing against me, and/or an injustice?
The employer is costing you a benefit that may have some value to you. That's a shabby way to treat employees. Of the options you suggest, I would consider it to be along the lines of abuse, less abusive if there's a stick of gum at stake, more so if it's a Ferrari.
Taking that tack might reduce the employer's capability to attract good employees and is certainly bad for the morale of current employees, unless all the employees are morally attuned to their employer, that is, or don't want the benefit. So there may be a cost to the employer as well as a cost to the employee.
If its an issue of moral values...
I'm unable to follow the question. |
