SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : A US National Health Care System?
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Lane3 who wrote (23212)2/20/2012 7:21:47 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (1) of 42652
 
The employer is costing you a benefit that may have some value to you. That's a shabby way to treat employees.

Only if the benefit is in some sense properly due to the employee. Otherwise every employer that every existed has treated its employees shabbily, since there is always something that they don't provide.

If its an issue of moral values...

I'm unable to follow the question.

If the employer doesn't provide the car or the gum because they are morally against it. It was included as a possibility, because of -

"If your employer has some moral or ethical problem with driving Ferraris such as gas guzzling, great risk of injury, frivolous excess, misuse of resources better spent on the starving children of the world, character harm (spoiling), etc., then that's being imposed on you by the employer's refusal to participate on behalf of its employees."

In a previous post of yours (emphasis added)
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News