Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It?

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: TopCat who wrote (125039)	2/29/2012 6:40:09 AM
From: TideGlider	2 Recommendations Read Replies (2) of 224648

TC O'Reilly never understood oil and I wonder what his beef with the oil companies is. His misunderstanding on the subject of oil as a commodity is two fold. He blames the oil companies for jacking up prices, yet they operate on smaller margins than the majority of corporations. It seems he cannot grasp the scale of oil companies while discussing profits. He also doesn't understand why "US" oil companies can't sell at a discount within the USA. It is very frustrating to listen to his nonsense on oil especially. It caused me to more rarely tune in. Frequently I will watch the first few minutes where they say what they will cover and turn him off til later, flipping to check only if a topic has interest. I stopped watching Hannity years ago due to his "lists". He continually repeats these lists: "Didn't they say...didn't he say etc etc etc. I think college kids could make a drinking game out of his program. Everytime Hannity repeats a list have a shot! A person would be blasted by the end of the show. Fridays is a good shot O'Reilly won't be on and a good program may follow. O'Reilly tries to hard to be for the "folks" as he calls them. He attempts to please everyone like McCain. If McCain did the factor the only difference would be the addition of adding..."My friends". I flipped in last night and saw him with the item about the muslim judge who tossed an assault case and stepped way over the line by chastising the victim and quoting sharia and muslim cultural BS. That would have been interesting but he glossed over it and wouldn't allow much to come out of the two female attorneys. He isn't even necessary in those discussions. He should allow the people who did the research to discuss the issues and make fewer comments. Wow, guess he frustrates the hell out of me too or I wouldn't be writing this so early in the morning! ;^)

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next