A US National Health Care System? Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : A US National Health Care System?

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Lane3 who wrote (23282)	2/29/2012 2:36:10 PM
From: Brumar89	2 Recommendations Read Replies (2) of 42652

If the nuns were still running ... So nuns are okay, it's the priests and bishops and folks like that that are the trouble makers, I guess. Are you sure about that? How do you know the nuns 'added value'? Were they better providing for 'customers' than other people? Cause if you can't show someone is better at 'customer service, smarter at management' (better than who?) than by golly they shouldn't be providing health care. Similarly, does a hospital being Catholic mean that it would inherently have better customer service, smarter management and staff, or be healthier? Why does anyone have to prove to you X or Y is better than someone else for you to approve of them doing something? If Catholic hospitals are closed or sold and we get government running them, will the federal government add value, be better at customer service, management, etc than Catholics were? You see everything as animosity, an example of seeing what you believe rather than believing what you see. And of eschewing nuance. Animosity may exist as one factor but that doesn't mean that there exist no other factors independent of said animosity. You admit animosity is a factor but don't like that I notice it.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next