ECHARTERS Message Board - Msg: 27980632

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : ECHARTERS

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Dirtythirty who wrote (3722)	2/29/2012 2:37:41 PM
From: E. Charters	Read Replies (1) of 3744

I don't know about meta-analysis of remote sensing finding gold. I guess statistical searches on data are worth a try, but gold rocks have been remotely sensed for 35 years now. It is not new. Unfortunately the associated minerals which map easily by IR are very common over non gold rocks too. No way they can see gold itself from space or even low flying aircraft measuring every reflected wave there is.. Even 200 ounces per tonne in exposed rock might not register on any equipment we know of unless it flew at 0.25 kms per hour 2 feet above the ground. There is a chance that multi spectral may be able to see patterns in emanations from vegetation and rocks that blend certain element signatures that predominate over gold deposits in some way. Gold itself may be a misunderstanding. They may target gold, but the patterns are not emanating from gold itself. Can't be. Maybe some ratio of alteration minerals to accessory minerals might work in some kind of metafactor analysis in some ways in certain terranes. The main thing emanating from most new technologies is hyperbolite. Find a remote sensing tool for investment money and you will have it made in shade.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next