Politics for Pros- moderated Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Brumar89 who wrote (477148)	3/17/2012 11:33:04 AM
From: Jorj X Mckie	13 Recommendations Read Replies (2) of 793952

Now you're asserting that the 1st Amendment means no anti-obscenity laws. I'd say that's for the courts to decide. I don't know why you made an exception for child porn and rape porn in your previous post ... surely those are 1st amendment protected too? This should be obvious, but I'll explain it to you. Child porn and rape porn (where someone is actually raped) does not involve consenting adults. The rights of others are being violated in a most heinous way and then being recorded. Hardcore porn is different in that it is between consenting adults. Nobody's rights are being violated. If you do not understand the difference between the two, I would recommend reading the constitution and then getting back to me before making another absurd statement.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next