SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Apple Inc.
AAPL 273.85+0.5%Dec 24 12:59 PM EST
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Edward Boghosian who wrote (128242)3/18/2012 3:37:55 PM
From: Cogito6 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) of 213177
 
>>If someone accepts that the most current gap will be filled as stated in one of the posts, then the earlier gap should also be filled. If one does not accept the fact that the earlier gap does/will not have to be filled but accepts the current gap should/will, then gaps do not necessarily have to be filled. Show me then where in the publications on technical analysis of securities it states this. I'm under the impression all gaps should be filled-sooner or later. If not, then, what decides which gap(s) is/are filled and which ones are not?<<

I think pointing out that there was a gap around 7 that has never been filled is a pretty good answer. The fact that a lot of people believe gaps have to be filled doesn't make it so, and I know Henry doesn't believe that. A lot of gaps do get filled, eventually, but that doesn't prove that it has to happen.

Just my opinion.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News