CCEE YEAR 2000 CO. Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : CCEE YEAR 2000 CO.

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Thomas Stanton who wrote (177)	11/24/1997 7:27:00 AM
From: Dr. Moze	Read Replies (1) of 202

umm, I think we misconnected here! The "split" I referred to in this post is the divvying up of revenues generated by dbExpress between BT and CCC. CCC provides the technical capability, BT incorporates it in their services and has the customer base, so they "split" the resulting revenues. As for your question, I agree strongly here. The reverse split may be only a safety net. If deals and revenues are growing, there should not be a need for a rev. split. I like to stay optimistic and realize that it is likely (as stated in the proxy form, etc.) that there were no signed deals at the time of the pre-proxy issue. Thus, it doesn't hurt to have a back-up plan to ensure a continued NASDAQ listing and (by authorizing more shares) ensure that sources of capital would be available to keep things afloat. I then hope that a big dbExpress deal or 2, combined with Softworks' growing revenues, would make all of these proxy issues moot, whether they pass or not. Methinks the Dannys may be smart enough to see that they willprofit most (personally) if the company is successful. I'm a-hopin'!

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next