SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : A US National Health Care System?

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: TimF who wrote (23541)3/30/2012 1:05:15 PM
From: Lane3  Read Replies (1) of 42652
 
If he doesn't want to join the organization its voluntary. If its his parents choice is their voluntary decision, although it may be involuntary for him.

That's irrelevant.

We're talking about an organization that is shunning a kid. His parents aren't deciding that he can't join. He hasn't decided that he doesn't want to join. There is nothing voluntary about his not joining. The organization is deciding to exclude him yet provide membership benefits to his buddies.

There are two ways to deal with that. One is bottom up--for his friends (and all the friends of other kids) to stand up for him and, by doing so, voluntarily forgo their own membership benefits and deprive the community of any collateral benefits. If enough do that, the organization will either wither away or accede. The other is for the greater society to shun the group in some form or fashion until it (voluntarily ?) accedes or folds its tent.

Forcing an organization to change because he's unhappy with their policies is unreasonable, and if that's what's commonly done, then its borderline totalitarian.

Or the government can, as you say, use force.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext