SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Technical analysis for shorts & longs
SPY 691.66-0.1%Jan 16 4:00 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Johnny Canuck who wrote (47682)4/5/2012 12:52:26 PM
From: Johnny Canuck  Read Replies (1) of 69861
 
No Wonder Companies Don’t Want To Go Public AnymoreBy Henry Blodget | Daily Ticker – 2 hours 45 minutes ago

(This post was originally featured on Business Insider)

There has been a dearth of IPOs in recent years.

This has led to widespread complaints among public-market investors that there's nothing exciting to invest in anymore.

It has also led to a much broader development of the private markets for hot emerging technology companies.

As a result, investors who can invest via these private markets have cashed in, while public-market investors have missed out.

Meanwhile, the companies that do go public are already so big and highly valued that there's often not much upside left.

So, why is it that companies don't go public anymore?

Well, for one thing, there's the cost. Thanks to the massive regulatory burden the country now places on public companies, it costs at least $5 million a year to be public. What small company in its right mind would want to pay that?

Then, for another thing, there's the enormous hassle and legal risk.

Case in point: Groupon ( GRPN).

Groupon went public at the end of last year. The company is only three years old. It's expanding into many new business lines, so it's still learning as it goes. One of the things Groupon just learned is that the new high-ticket items it is selling have a higher return rate than the lower-ticket items. This realization forced Groupon to restate its Q4 earnings just a few months after going public.

Is that embarrassing?

Yes.

Is it FRAUD?

Unlikely. More likely, Groupon just wasn't conservative enough in its assumptions. Presumably, it has now learned a searing lesson.

But now look at what Groupon has to deal with:

That's just a small sample--there will be many more.

All of these defenders of the stupid innocent will search the land to find some mom and pop investors--people who never, ever should have bought a stock as risky as Groupon--and use them to shake down Groupon for some settlement money.

And Groupon will pay the settlement money, just to make these folks go away.

The lawyers will take most of the settlement. The mom and pop investors will probably get about $2.98 apiece.

Importantly, Groupon looked like a lousy investment when it went public. That's what I shouted from the rooftops. That's what Jim Cramer shouted from the rooftops. That's what a boatload of other people shouted from the rooftops.

But what made Groupon lousy was not the fact that it has had to make a minor earnings restatement. It was that investors were just paying way too much for the stock of a company that was still experiencing major growing pains.

Investors who choose to do that, voluntarily, despite all the warnings, should take some responsibility for their decisions.

But they won't.

Because this is America. The United States Of Litigation. The country where if you do something stupid it's always someone else's fault.

And that means that, if there is any conceivable way for "the public" to invest in your company, you're eventually going to get your ass sued off--whether or not the investment was suitable or smart for the people who bought it.

So, faced with that reality, why WOULD any company want to go public?

Why not just stay private? Reduce your litigation risk. Keep your costs down. Deal only with investors who understand that investing is a voluntary and risky activity and that sometimes, god forbid, you actually lose money.

[Johnny: Keep in mind that companies really go public so that the early investors can monetize their investment. Once you reach a certain size it is often hard for a single investor to buy you out and big pension funds want more mature companies with proven cashflow and dividends. The only other choice is to go public so that you can be owned by a broad base of investors.

One thing the article misses is that if you "make money the old fashion way - actuallyearn it" the $5 million per year is a small expense as it gives you more ways to raise money at favorable rates. Try getting the same interest rates as CSCO can borrow from the bank if you are a smaller company with no public reporting and no analyst coverage. You can't even float corporate bonds or do preferred shares.]
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext