SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Welcome to Slider's Dugout
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: prometheus1976 who wrote (25836)4/10/2012 5:09:52 PM
From: SARMAN5 Recommendations  Read Replies (2) of 50281
 
That is exactly the point. Let the jury decide. This is what the jury is going to hear and see. A man walking with no weapon got shot by a man with a weapon. Regardless of the weaponless man's background, he was shot and killed by an armed man. How hard is it for people to comprehend that fact.

It is not a racial issue. If people want to make it a racial issue, I would suggest to reverse the rolls of the victim and the killer. A white weaponless man walking and a black man with a weapon shot him. I doubt that you will be contributing funds for the black man that shot the white man.

People this is America the law is blind. At least this is what I like to believe.

Just a thought here, what if the accuse was a Muslim? Would you contribute funds for his defense? I doubt it.

The point I am making is there is a victim and the killer admitted killing him. The sad part of all this is the police investigated the victim and let the killer go free. How ass-backward is that?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News