Wow. You don't read or comprehend very well, do you?
"Pulling the trigger" is NOT the issue. The issue is WHO attacked physically FIRST. Pretty simple. If the kid turned and did the attacking, then the shooting is justified, because someone who attacks with his fists could easily be assumed to kill if he were to take the gun from the person BEING ATTACKED FIRST!
How do you know the kill was not protecting his life? If the kid had taken the gun in the attack, it could have been the other way around. Again, the GUILTY party is the one who attacked physically FIRST.
Stupid question to ask if you have the right to carry a weapon and kill those whose looks you do not like. He said nothing remotely like that. He said you have a right, with a permit, to carry a weapon legally, and IF ATTACKED, or IF someone is attempting to STEAL your property, then YES, you DO have the right to protect yourself or your property.
Tattoos with a specific meaning tell a lot about who this kid was. You SHOULD care, just as you SHOULD care that the MSM is putting up photos trying to make him a choir boy, when that is not reality. The MSM and the POTUS are MAKING this a RACE issue ON PURPOSE. Why do they not put up accurate photos and post the FACTS, rather than baiting a low IQ mob with innuendo and made up BS? I'd tell you, but then you should do some thinking on your own.
Hint -- it's related to the 450 million rounds of ammo ordered by DHS recently. |
