The Environmentalist Thread Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Environmentalist Thread

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Land Shark who wrote (35212)	4/13/2012 12:04:45 PM
From: Hawkmoon	Read Replies (2) of 36921

We're supposed to give credibility to an article that uses language that stereotypes skeptics of climate science methodology as "anti-science"? Ironically, or tragically, just as the anti-science disinformation campaign was ramping up, the advocates of climate action decided to downplay climate in their pitch for action, as theWashington Post’s Ezra Klein explained it in his June 2010 article, “ Can you solve global warming without talking about global warming?“ I understand pretty darn well what climate "science" is.. The majority of it is based upon skewed and distorted climate models and cherry-picked data points. And Raw data, as we saw with the CRU conspiracy, is hidden and destroyed in order to prevent other scientists from reviewing it for the purpose of confirmation or refutation. Ask yourself why all the GW "scientists" and policy hacks suddenly decided to call it "Climate Change"? Because suddenly their facts were not supporting their conclusion that Global Warming was occurring.. So they decided to call it "climate change".. The bottom line is that the earth has been undergoing climate change for millions of years.. cycling in and out of ice ages (and we're still currently coming out of the last one) and warming periods... Furthermore, we ignore the natural influences that might actually be aggravating climate variation, in order to crucify ourselves and make the case for controlling the human masses (making a ton of money for people like Al Gore in the process). I'm certainly NOT anti-science. I see myself as defending the scientific process. Let every scientist present their data for peer review by EVERY other scientist.. Leave the egos at the doorstep, pursue the truth, and let the chips fall where they may.. Hawk

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next