SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Obama - Clinton Disaster
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: DuckTapeSunroof who wrote (69676)4/27/2012 6:33:23 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (1) of 103300
 
There was *NOT* significantly 'more income PER PERSON'... the term you are searching for is "per FAMILY".

No the term that I am accurately using is per person, your apparently arguing per employee. If more people work, for about the same amount of money, income per person goes up. Income per family probably would also go up (unless families shrink, which they did but not enough), income per employee stays the same.

But that wasn't the case since average income per worker went up (so the other two went up even more). (Income includes but does not equal wages).
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News