Politics for Pros- moderated Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: unclewest who wrote (484832)	4/28/2012 12:45:19 AM
From: KLP	2 Recommendations Read Replies (1) of 793574

I wonder if very many Americans really realize that using any one of these three things would cause severe problems for Americans who lived through such an attack. When people think of WMD, I think they think of nuclear, but IMO, by far the most dangerous situation would be biological WMD....Nukes could wipe out entire states, and millions of people. But Bio weapons have the potential to cause huge problems for not only this country, but world wide trouble.... Many people screamed loudly when "no WMD" was found in Iraq....but those people and others have forgotten about the Chemicals that were used on the Kurds by Saddam....Bio weapons are small....who knows what the situation is on those.... The other side of the same coin is this - Massive use of WMDs (chemical, biological, nuclear) has the potential to rapidly change any of the equations.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next