SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Evolution

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Giordano Bruno who wrote (25522)4/29/2012 11:05:25 AM
From: longnshort  Read Replies (1) of 69300
 
Twelve reasons why Stonehenge was a building

Stonehenge was a building. That’s it, no mystery. If it was a rectangle this would not be an issue, but British Prehistoric buildings are predominantly circular from this period onward.
The rings of postholes at Stonehenge [Y, Z, Q, and R holes] are often ignored, or are thought to be redundant stone holes, but it is just one of a group of concentric timber structures known from various periods in British Prehistory. Like Woodhenge, Durrington Walls, Mount Pleasant, and The Sanctuary, Stonhenge was a large timber building. This was tentatively recognised by Tim Darvil in 1996, who called them Class Ei structures.

structuralarchaeology.blogspot.com
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext