Value Investing Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Value Investing

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: NikhilJog who wrote (47978)	5/16/2012 12:49:00 AM
From: richardred	Read Replies (1) of 78425

>I don't think you should focus so much on the legal issues NikhilJog: the only reason I brought about the lawsuit comment is they are quite common place these days in M&A activity. >Have you taken a look at company bylaws and what kind of power it gives to the board of directors? No- I feel I have no need to, because what was most important was that the slate of directors was re-elected by the major shareholders. Even AVP's former CEO was surprised, that AJ was re-elected, so was I. IMO-Understanding Bylaws is more suited for the Martin Marietta/ Vulcan Materials mess. Believe me, I'm waiting to hear AVP's response. I've already made reference to some of your AVP ? points. Clownbuck also made a good point. If Coty really wanted AVP. Why wouldn't they wait 7 days? BTW- I saw some of your commentary and was impressed. Since this is the value board how about an opinion on IEC-IEC-Electronics. I just bought back in. I think it's a high risk, good value currently. I was very surprised by the recent earnings numbers.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next