SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Evolution

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Greg or e who wrote (26232)5/19/2012 8:46:22 PM
From: 2MAR$  Read Replies (1) of 69300
 
The essay on morality starts out so convolutedly defeating itself at the beginning with Chosen Ones killing Chosen Ones with the obligatory references & quote mining from arch atheist Dawkins and the antiquated oversimplification of scientfic community's most recent commentary on morality . Why not look to see what scientists are really saying than a few cobbled together paragraphs in this very inadequate attempt to describe today's forum , why not look to see what scientists themsleves are saying?

Richard Dawkin's has more recently changed his views somewhat after influenced by friend Sam Harris's book , it would be efficacious if these writers you copy & paste could really try to stay up to date .

Science of morality
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Science_of_morality

Richard Dawkins had openly stated that science has little to say directly about morality. He has since said, about science of morality as friend and colleague Harris presents it in The Moral Landscape, that it "changed all that for me". [86]

In an online interview, Dawkins reiterated that he believes that Harris makes relevant points, and that, once one defines the moral goal as maximizing the wellbeing of creatures, science has much to say about what is actually morally good. [87]

Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext