Politics for Pros- moderated Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: SirWalterRalegh who wrote (488156)	5/22/2012 4:33:59 PM
From: MulhollandDrive	5 Recommendations Read Replies (1) of 793999

she keeps on with this 'vetting' nonsense and refuses to endorse romney as the presumptive nominee, despite even gingrich (looking for $$$) and santorum (who knew he would probably lose PA) giving their 'endorsement' at this point she looks more and more irrelevant and unwilling to accept the fact that she blew it by endorsing an unelectable presidential candidate and hinting endorsement at the other when her endorsement finally comes it will be a day late and a dollar short and there will be a big collective 'well duh, sarah' response.... basically i think she is milking the RR who are obviously disgruntled about romney, the mormon, that is HER base.... she lost me way back in december and thus far has does nothing to redeem herself if she wants to stay relevant, let her run for elective office in AZ, her 'adopted' state, and stop badmouthing the rest of the candidates who are actually out there doing the work

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next