SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Plastics to Oil - Pyrolysis and Secret Catalysts and Alterna
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Steady_on who wrote (24865)5/23/2012 2:14:25 AM
From: PaperProphetRead Replies (1) of 53574
 
Let me just ask you this point blank, Steady_on: Do you think it's an unreasonable or stupid question to ask Mr. Bordynuik what still has to happen before the processors can be placed in continuous commercial operation?

Do you think it would be unreasonable to ask him to clarify whether or not "...as of the date of this filing, operates two processors..." means that the processors have been running continuously at 75% up time since the 10-Q came out?

I see those as very valid (and extremely important) questions and I just want to know if you agree that they're valid or whether you think I'm way off base.

Keep in mind that in a normal company, shareholders wouldn't have to ask...but poor Mr. Bordynuik has such an apparent poor grasp on the English language that being able to clearly and unambiguously communicate the status of the processors is beyond his capabilities. As such, it would be important for someone to simply ask.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News