SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
From: bentway5/29/2012 1:35:36 AM
   of 1579464
 
Zoos Choose Which Species Live, Which Ones Die

ZOO DIRECTORS TRY TO STRIKE A BALANCE WITH ENTERTAINING THE PUBLIC

By Neal Colgrass, Newser Staff
newser.com
( Unless we control our numbers, we're going to lose most of the animal life on this planet. )
Posted May 28, 2012 4:50 PM CDT

(NEWSER) – To be or not to be: That is increasingly the question for American zoos, which have to choose whether entire species live or die, the New York Times reports. With many species facing extinction, zoos are being asked to preserve the most endangered, a mission that can conflict with their need to entertain the public. "That model is broken," says one conservationist of zoos-as-entertainment. "There needs to be an explicit role for zoos to champion species.”

Many zoo directors are resisting the pressure, or trying to strike a balance. The St. Louis Zoo is breeding scores of black-and-white ruffed lemurs, for example, as part of an effort to keep them going. But many zoos are giving up on the lion-tailed macaques, of which only about 4,000 are left in the wild. One St. Louis Zoo manager likens it to gambling: “It is like looking out the window of an airplane and seeing the rivets in the wing,” he said. “You can probably lose a few, but you don’t know how many, and you really don’t want to find out.”
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext