SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : EVOLUTION
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Giordano Bruno who wrote (95)5/30/2012 3:59:28 PM
From: one_less1 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) of 252
 
Everything has it's place and there is nothing binding us exclusively to a Newtonian paradigm. The practice of outlawing things is often more emotional or for nefarious control purposes than it is for the best interests of advancing our evolutionary progress. So, unless such 'outlawing' restricts us from action, there is no good reason to sanction it. In addition, assuming the “scientific community” is always scientific may be a mistake. Laws of science are often revised, where the very things forbidden at one moment in time may at some point become standard.

So, if we are willing to open the doors of consciousness to a unified theory of reality, then we have already made the decision to abandon restrictions which could be imposed on information gathering. That doesn’t mean we can’t continue to apply scientific method and validate information.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News