SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : BAK - Investing

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: kollmhn who wrote (2809)5/30/2012 9:00:55 PM
From: Flipper2058  Read Replies (1) of 3249
 
Re: Flipper-

"If they have not re-fi'd the GAB F 6.20s by then, why wouldn't one prefer the Fs to a new B for an extra 3% per year?"

I own a lot of GAB-F but you know the reason why I don't own too much. It is just a different animal. The call on it makes the yield 100 BP higher and that is some protection from rates going higher. I am told they have no plans to call it as it is likely they could not do a lot better. This is the key question to ask...not "will you call it?"

As I mention I love the fact I am not dealing with credit issues on these family of preferreds. Any sell-off is rates or liquidity and I am OK with liquidity sell-offs. Rates have me a tad worried but I keep spread sheets on the spread between the 10 year and 30 year T-bomb. Both spreads to GAB-F are at new highs. So I am not inclined to hedge for yield risk much here.

PEople paying $26+ I think are paying too much. Break even is too far away then given the call risk. It has taken me since last Fall to build a position and I continue to build it when the timing is right.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext