SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum
GLD 375.93-1.8%Nov 14 4:00 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Maurice Winn who wrote (90800)5/31/2012 11:02:21 AM
From: skinowski  Read Replies (1) of 217789
 
Maurice, I don't quite agree that the issues which I brought up are irrelevant to the concept of Tradeable Citizenship. I think they are. And, indeed, having mentioned how people just "spray some words" over an issue without understanding it, you went ahead and made many good comments on the questions that I raised, in a rather serious and lucent manner... :)

But you are right - psychology matters. Like any big social engineering concept, your idea has many weak spots, and none is more important than the expectation that owners of a Tradeable Citizenship will behave... rationally. People are not very rational, and when they are - they don't do it very consistently.

Many strange and unpredictable types of behavior will take place. You will find millions of people all over the world "raising cash" by recklessly selling their citizenships, and doing whatever - partying, traveling, (mal)investing. Once the money is gone, they'll come back home and move in with their parents, or their families. Other citizens will be forced to act to protect the value of their citizenships, and will try to remove those reckless individuals. Before you know, you'll need a far more powerful police and immigration service that what we have today.

In other words, you start with a wonderful idea, but in order to keep it going, it must become a police state. And who would want to live in a police state?

And this is only one criticism, described as briefly as possible. There are others.

I think that the opposite direction is better -- we need to decrease the power of government, and allow smaller jurisdictions and communities to decide more things for themselves.

Let's see which communities will grow and prosper and attract taxpayers - cleptocracies, or those that are well managed, safe, and with good schools.

PS : What makes you think that paying taxes means being a "tax slave"? By this logic, every time I buy gasoline, I become an oil industry slave. In a relatively "sane" world, by paying my taxes I am merely purchasing certain services.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext