Apple Inc. Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Apple Inc.

AAPL 278.28

+0.1%

Dec 12 9:30 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Lahcim Leinad who wrote (134696)	6/3/2012 10:32:29 AM
From: Sr K	Read Replies (1) of 213176

That article is marked updated 07:19 pm EDT, Sat June 2, 2012 Read more: electronista.com but it's hard to recall when the original story broke. Friday or some day during the past week. Any "updata" is not noticeable. If I had to pay to read an article that I already read when it was first reported, I'd resent that pricing policy. It would also mean that users would be charged for clicking or searching or any accidental click like when you swipe and hit something left or right or above and then have to Back to get where you were, unless the refreshed page was cached. Some websites have places where if you click, you don't go where you think but 2 windows open and you go to the ad one. If you close that window, you get to the place you thought you were going. Or you can hit that tab to the left right away. Would users get charged for data downloaded to a tab that is never opened? I realize pricing would be in buckets, so incremental charges would not be as obvious as incremental data flow, but it would change the Internet tremendously.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next