SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Ascend Communications (ASND)
ASND 206.52-1.2%3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Gary Korn who wrote (24693)11/25/1997 9:55:00 PM
From: Glenn D. Rudolph  Read Replies (4) of 61433
 
When Insider Selling Means 'Buy' Corporate officers now dump shares in the face of good news, not bad. In some cases, those sales can be extra sunny. By Craig Columbus Negative earnings surprises are becoming a rare event as companies get better at guiding securities analysts' forecasts. Executives often begin warning of slower growth a couple of quarters ahead of the actual impact on the company's income statement, and analysts oblige by ratcheting down their projections. To get just as far ahead of the downward curve, research at Disclosure Inc. suggests that investors should look carefully at the sales of stock by insiders. But not in the places they might imagine. Disclosure studies show that insiders frequently sell in the last good quarter -- before the company's fundamentals begin to erode. Similar results have been found in other research, including an article published in the June 1995 edition of the Journal of Business, Finance and Accounting that showed most insider selling occurs after the announcement of good earnings. Why do insiders sell on good news? A recent study conducted by finance professor Carl Bettis of Arizona State University showed that the vast majority of publicly traded companies have formal guidelines governing insider-trading activity. Almost all companies have some policy that restricts their insiders from trading immediately before or after the announcement of earnings (often 10 days in either direction). As a practical matter, many high-level insiders impose even tighter restrictions upon themselves when it comes to selling shares. To be sure, top corporate officers clearly do want to get the best prices for their shares; they know when the firm is on the verge of losing a major client, or when capital-equipment expenses have gotten out of hand. But rather than wait until the bad news shows up on income statements, they sell much earlier than widely believed. Two top reasons: * With increased media scrutiny and the proliferation of hungry securities lawyers, no executive wants to be seen as bailing out just before a stock's retreat. * Securities laws have generally been effective at deterring corporate insiders from selling too closely to a negative earnings surprises. Nike (NKE) and Amgen (AMGN) insiders illustrated this type of behavior recently. The July insider sales at each company were well-timed, but certainly not improper. All the companies reported earnings in line with analyst expectations for the quarter in which insiders were dropping shares. However, these stocks experienced subsequent weakness when analysts predicted slower growth for each in the latter half of 1997. These are excellent businesses with solid long-term growth potential. Unlike insider buying, the market rarely reacts to only insider sales because they seldom point to cases in which the sky is falling. Instead, the sales can be used as an early heads-up to cases in which revenue growth may be slowing two or three quarters down the road. Insider Selling: Sometimes a Bullish Indicator There are times when insider selling can actually be used as a bullish indicator, however. That happens when companies are the target of shareholder lawsuits surrounding prior insider trading. Shareholder suits against inside traders often share some common traits: They frequently claim that management made some kind of misrepresentation -- either via its financial disclosures, public comments or shareholder communications. Then, as investors relied on this information, executives capitalized by selling shares shortly before the stock dropped sharply. 3Com (COMS), Informix (IFMXE) and America Online (AOL) have each been the target of such suits over the past couple of years. ÿ ÿ No matter how frivolous, shareholder suits alleging improper insider selling creates a cautious climate throughout a company -- and must be disclosed to shareholders. In the case of 3Com, several insiders displayed excellent timing in December 1996, when they sold over 800,000 shares at around $80. The stock subsequently lost more than half its value over the next two months amid fears of greater competitive pressures. On March 24, 1997, a class-action suit was filed. The shares subsequently rebounded above $50, and insiders again began selling in earnest. Since August, 3Com executives have sold or filed to sell nearly 2.5 million shares, mostly in the $50-$54 range. In most cases, shareholder litigation alleging improper insider selling creates a more cautious climate throughout a company, regardless of the merits of the suit. No matter how frivolous, this type of lawsuit, as well as other litigation, must be disclosed to shareholders. And no company likes those kind of disclosures. Therefore, evidence suggests that when executives in these companies return to the market to sell again, they probably do so with greater confidence that there are no major negative surprises looming on the horizon. Even if the insiders doing the latest selling were not alleged to have participated in the prior malfeasance, the current sellers are still likely more vigilant. Companies are becoming increasingly concerned with the way their insider trading is perceived by the market. Investor-relations professionals are now quick to react to any major development -- from sending out press releases to announce large purchases by key executives to calling insider analysts to put the best spin on heavy selling. ÿ ÿ Snapshot Price History Overview Earnings Estimates A company that recently caught our attention: American Power Conversion (APCC), the maker of uninterruptible power-supply equipment such as surge protectors. A review of the company's SEC filings reveals that in February 1996, two shareholders filed a suit against present and former officers and directors of the company. The suit alleges that the "individual defendants traded in the stock allegedly in breach of their fiduciary duty to the company." The allegations stem from insider sales (over 400,000 shares around the $20 mark) that occurred in June 1995, before the release of poor second-quarter results. Trading above the $25 level in early July, American Power Conversion closed out 1995 below $10. Shares of American Power Conversion rebounded nicely, however, breaking the $30 level in early 1997. After refraining from any trading in the first quarter of 1997, insiders sold over 300,000 shares in May and June at prices from $20 to $23. The stock since performed quite well, climbing to as high as $32 after reporting solid second-quarter results. ÿ ÿ Wall Street can't stand slower earnings growth -- no matter what the reason. -- Casey Alexander Casey Alexander, special situations analyst at Gilford Securities and a longtime bull on American Power Conversion, recently downgraded the stock. "This company has been growing earnings at 30-40%, but the next two quarters look like they are going to be weaker," says Alexander. Sound familiar? The company intends to introduce new products during that time, likely driving up its sales expenses. Alexander believes that management has been cautioning the Street to expect lower operating margins as a result. But he adds, "Wall Street can't stand slower earnings growth -- no matter what the reason." American Power Conversion, in other words, neatly fits the earlier description -- insider selling well in advance of any potential weakness. In this case, the presence of prior litigation acted as short-term support. Investors scared off by insider selling earlier in the summer would have missed the move to $32. Patience can, in fact, be a virtue. When you see insider selling in cases like this, think of it as insurance for the quarter -- a window of time in which you can trade the company's shares with a measure of downside protection. To find companies at which insiders were sellers of stock even though earnings were rising sharply and soundly beating analysts' expectations, we screened in Investment Finder for firms that reported year-over-year and quarter-over-quarter earnings gains of greater than 20%, a recent quarterly surprise of greater than 20% and net insider sales. Here are the top 10 stocks that fit the screen. Subscribers can see the full list in the Investment Finder.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext