SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum
GLD 366.07-0.1%Nov 6 4:00 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: TobagoJack who wrote (91162)6/7/2012 9:15:26 AM
From: carranza21 Recommendation  Read Replies (2) of 217561
 
That article has led me to consider the possibility that the huge derivative exposure banks face is simply not real.

No sane banker would expose his bank to the potential liabilities represented by the nominal values inherent in blown up derivatives. No way. It's just impossible to consider unless, of course, there is some sort of implicit deal to cancel these liabilities in exchange for assistance in manipulating interest rates. If they rise, we are screwed. And, as the writer points out, a great many of these derivatives are related to interest rates.

It happened with LTCM, AIG, etc.

The next bubble is the one we can't see: the interest rate bubble. Is it possible that the TBTF banks are not allowed to fail because they are instrumental in controlling interest rates? And their reward are the profits inherent in being able to borrow at ZIR?

Can the powers that be keep interest rates low for an indefinite period of time? That's what it's going to take to avoid a catastrophe.

I wouldn't bet on it. Things eventually revert to the mean.

Great article. I disagree with some of the writer's points, but there is a lot to consider there.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext