TED,
Since you are not picking actual companies to invest in, rather just the toolsets that are good ... better ... best, you don't have to worry about being qualified as an investor adviser or have problems with making actual stock picks.
If you already have people calling you, then I am sure that the demand exists for such a service. I don't have to tell you how technically illiterate many of these wall street reporters are when it comes to year 2000 technology.
These guys are not "techies" they are "stockies", they can only talk about revenues and potential revenues, they don't really care about the technology. Automated, Fully-Automated, End-to-End Automated, none of these terms mean any different to them and they are not technically knowledgeable to find the distinctions.
Someone like me, who is a not a "techie", would use your report in combination with analysis of a particular company.
Just because you have the best technology, doesn't mean you will have the best stock performance. Sometimes a company that has great marketing and a so-so tool may fair better than one that has a great tool, but so-so marketing.
Your report would at least help people find out the one with the best technology. The other stuff, fundamentals and management skills, and marketing potential is easier to decipher.
I really think you should give some thought to it.
You could even start off with the first report on CSGI. <gg>
but I think I should get it for free ? |
