Politics for Pros- moderated Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: goldworldnet who wrote (491330)	6/17/2012 10:04:39 PM
From: Copeland	2 Recommendations Read Replies (1) of 793843

I hate to say it UW, but sometimes I think the only function US wars serve today is to keep US defense contractors in business and I was a defense contractor employee for over 30 years. I know that's not entirely true, but it is a factor. Unfortunately, I think we've been going to war to maintain not only the hegemony that our country has enjoyed since the end of World War II, but also to guarantee that our fuel supplies (and by default, the collateral behind the petrodollar) are secure. Maintaining the military-industrial complex has always been a secondary goal. Looking back at all the wars that we've fought since 1945, I can't seem to find one that didn't have one of those two goals as an ulterior motive. Korea: Hegemony (block the Chinese/Soviets) Vietnam: Hegemony (block the Chinese/Soviets) Grenada: Hegemony (limit communism in the Caribbean) Panama: Hegemony (maintain control over the canal zone) Bosnia: Hegemony (establish control over the Balkans for NATO/America) Gulf War I: Oil (ensure that our "allies" control the majority of oil) Iraq: Oil, Hegemony Afghanistan: Hegemony (Revenge) Libya: Oil

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next