 
  Google tries to block U.S. shipments of Apple’s iPhone and iPad over 3G patents  By:  Jonathan S. Geller | Jun 25th, 2012 at 05:06PM 
  bgr.com 
     
  Google is seeking to block U.S. imports of Apple’s iPhone and iPad over 3G patents, Bloomberg is reporting. 
  Developing… 
  By Susan Decker and William McQuillen  June 25 (Bloomberg) — A U.S. trade agency said it willreview a judge’s findings that Apple Inc.’s iPhone and iPad tablet computer infringe a patent owned by Google Inc.’s Motorola Mobility unit, in a case that could lead to imports of the devices being banned. The U.S. International Trade Commission said it will review ITC Judge Thomas Pender’s findings that Apple was violating one  Motorola Mobility patent. The commission is scheduled to issue a  final decision on Aug. 24, and has the power to block devices  made in Asia from entering the U.S. The iPhone, iPad and related  devices generate 78 percent of Apple’s revenue.  The commission said it would review aspects of all four  Motorola Mobility patents in the case, including the one found  to be infringed. The agency also will consider whether it should  be issuing import bans on products found to infringe patents  related to industry standards. Notice of the commission’s  decision was posted today on the agency’s website.  The iPhone generated $22 billion in sales last quarter for  Apple, or 58 percent of the company’s total revenue. It was the  best-selling smartphone in the U.S., with 29 percent of the  market, while Motorola Mobility had 10 percent, researcher NPD  Group said May 2.  Apple’s iPad dominates the tablet computer market, with 72  percent of the market, according to researcher DisplaySearch.  The iPad and related products brought in $9.2 billion for Apple,  almost 20 percent of its revenue.  Motorola Mobility filed the complaint in October 2010 as a  pre-emptive strike after Apple made public statements that  phones running on Google’s Android operating system were copying  features of the iPhone. The dispute is part of a broader global  battle for supremacy in the smartphone and tablet computer  markets that also pits Apple against Android-device  manufacturers Samsung Electronics Co. and HTC Corp.  Android is the most popular platform for smartphones, with  61 percent of the market, NPD said.  Apple is appealing its loss in the patent-infringement  complaint it filed at the ITC against Libertyville, Illinois-  based Motorola Mobility, and a federal judge in Chicago last  week threw out patent claims Apple and Motorola Mobility had  filed against each other. Google bought Motorola Mobility in  part to gain access to its trove of 17,000 patents, many on  phone technology.  Cupertino, California-based Apple also has filed a  complaint against Motorola Mobility at the European Union,  accusing the handset manufacturer of misusing patents that  relate to industry standards.  The patent that Pender said Apple infringed relates to the  industry standard for 3G technology used by most phones, and  Motorola Mobility has argued that Apple infringes the patent by  following the standard.  Apple argued that, since Motorola Mobility helped establish  the standard, it shouldn’t be allowed to block use of patent  inventions related to the standard. It filed a lawsuit accusing  Motorola Mobility of breaching its contractual obligation to  license any standard-essential patents on fair and reasonable  terms.  The U.S. Federal Trade Commission, members of Congress and  Microsoft Corp. have filed papers supporting Apple’s argument  that import bans should not be imposed on such patents. Verizon  Wireless, the largest U.S. mobile-phone service provider, and  No. 2 AT&T Inc. filed papers making similar arguments.  Verizon Wireless, jointly owned by Verizon Communications  Inc. and Vodafone Group Plc, also said an import ban on the  iPhone “would hamper technological development, strand critical  infrastructure investment and cost American jobs.”  The patent that was found to be infringed covers a way to  eliminate noise so signals are clearer. A Wi-Fi patent is  invalid because it doesn’t cover a new invention, the judge  said. No infringement was found on two other patents, for a way  the server tracks which applications are available, and a sensor  to determine the proximity of a person’s head to the phone so it  doesn’t accidentally hang up or dial unwanted numbers.  The case against Apple is In the Matter of Wireless  Communication Devices, Portable Music and Data Processing  Devices, Computers and Components Thereof, 337-745, and Apple’s  case against Motorola Mobility is In the Matter of Mobile  Devices and Related Software, 337-750, both U.S. International  Trade.  |