SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Alan Smithee who wrote (492867)6/27/2012 12:39:46 PM
From: Bill2 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) of 793650
 
The administration argued in the FL district that the mandate was integral to the funding mechanism for the entire bill. They further argued the entire bill would have to be rewritten if the mandate is cancelled. That's one reason judge Vinson ruled the entire bill unconstitutional.

If the USSC rules against the mandate, the cleanest thing would be to dump all of it. If they let everything except the mandate stand, I assume they are in essence affirming that nothing else contested in the bill is unconstitutional.

Romney and the republicans should move to repeal it even if it's deemed constitutional. It's bad law, and by now everyone knows it.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News