EDTA (was GIFT) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : EDTA (was GIFT)

EDTA 0.0000500

0.0%

Nov 21 9:30 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Steven Durrington who wrote (744)	9/16/1996 10:10:00 PM
From: David A. Lethe	of 2383

Steven, I think Mr. Fink is on the right track... Providing specific details as to when, how much, and which products were sold in "violation" of the patent should be saved for the damages portion of the trial. I read some of the 260+ page document and found it complete enough to establish that the defendants clearly violate the patent on a daily basis. It would also seem to me that defending against general violations would rack up more billable hours for the defandants, and less billable hours for E-Data, even though Mr. Fink is paid in stock. In the event E-DATA wins, (or looks like they are going to win), it positions E-DATA to demand a higher compensation (or a settlement). Disclaimer - I am not an attorney, but am long on E-DATA.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next