Gallery Resources (Alberta GYR) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gallery Resources (Alberta GYR)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Kent C. who wrote (1089)	11/26/1997 1:42:00 PM
From: Terry J. Crebs	Read Replies (1) of 1829

Sounds like Gallery is concerned that Phoenix Geophysics' previous MT and/or Borehole-EM interpretations are suspect, and has hired Lamontagne Geophysics to re-survey/re-interpret to confirm or disprove the off-hole stronger mineralization potential. This is not a favorable development. Sadly, it appears that Gallery has no on-staff geophysicist and is depending on contractors to acquire and interpret its geophysics; worse, it appears to me that Gallery's geologic staff may have little experience on how to integrate their assay, mineralogical, petrological, and geophysical data-sets. Gallery's Okak results-to-date do not look very pretty.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next